Jahnie Van Zyl vs Noa Liauw A Fong Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Zyl vs Fong analysis and find out who is favored!
Jahnie Van Zyl vs Noa Liauw A Fong Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Zyl 0 - 0 Fong
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Zyl has won 43.9% of points on their second serve, while Fong has won 38.83%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Zyl, in recent form, has won 62.69% of their opponent's second serve points, while Fong has won 57.76%. The same stats for first serve returns are 45.86% and 43.05% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Zyl has saved 39.62% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Fong has saved 47.73% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Zyl has won 77.78% of matches played (W/L 7/ 2), with Fong winning 52.17% (W/L 12/ 11) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Zyl has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 78% (W/L 7/ 2), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 78% (W/L 7/ 2). Fong has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 57% (W/L 4/ 3), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1).
- Player level: In the last year, Zyl has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 75% of matches (W/L 6/ 2), where as Fong has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 46.15% of matches (W/L 6/ 7). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Zyl has played against opponents with an average rank of 132.11 while Fong has played against players with an average rank of 53.3.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Zyl has won 100% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Fong has won 50% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Zyl has converted 51.76% of breakpoint opportunities, and Fong has converted 49.18% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
N/A
Rank
High
15
Age
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
856
Rank
577
High
24
Age
Plays
Form
78% (7-2)
Career Total W/L
49% (92-96)
78% (7-2)
YTD W/L
53% (10-9)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
![banner](https://matchstat.com/assets/images/matchstat-banner.webp)
The Best Odds For Jahnie Van Zyl vs Noa Liauw A Fong For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Zyl VS Fong
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Jahnie Van Zyl | Noa Liauw A Fong |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 78% (7/2) | 53% (10/9) |
Sets Win/Loss | 67% (14/7) | 50% (20/20) |
Games Win/Loss | 59% (106/73) | 51% (185/179) |
Hard Win/Loss | 78% (7/2) | 53% (10/9) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0.02 | 0.03 |
Aces Total | 2 | 5 |
DFs per game | 0.23 | 0.48 |
DFs Total | 20 | 84 |
Avg Match Time | 1:33:40 | 1:20:37 |
Avg Opp Rank | 132.11 | 64.53 |
1st Serve % | 67% (340/504) | 66% (606/915) |
1st Serve W% | 61% (207/340) | 54% (328/606) |
2nd Serve W% | 44% (72/164) | 39% (120/309) |
BPs Won% Total | 52% (44/85) | 49% (60/122) |
Return Pts W% | 52% (270/515) | 49% (406/833) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 100% (1/0) | 57% (4/3) |
Futures W/L | 75% (6/2) | 50% (6/6) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 78% (7/9) | 53% (10/19) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 67% (2/3) |
Deciding Set W% | 100% (3/3) | 100% (2/2) |
1st set W, W | 100% (6/6) | 100% (9/9) |
1st set W, L | 0% (6/0) | 0% (9/0) |
1st set L, W | 33% (3/1) | 10% (10/1) |
Jahnie Van Zyl Recent Matches Played
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Jahnie Van Zyl
Player
Amanda Carolina Nava Elkin
67%
(
60 of
90)
1st Serve %
60%
(
51 of
85)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
6
58%
(
35 of
60)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
29 of
51)
37%
(
11 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
12 of
34)
44%
(
7 of
16)
Break Points Won
60%
(
6 of
10)
49%
(
44 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
44 of
85)
90
Total Points Won
85
|
6-3 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Nagomi Higashitani
Player
Jahnie Van Zyl
68%
(
39 of
57)
1st Serve %
76%
(
34 of
45)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
1
56%
(
22 of
39)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
14 of
34)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
44%
(
25 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
27 of
45)
59
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Jahnie Van Zyl
Player
Jacqueline Cabaj Awad
76%
(
65 of
85)
1st Serve %
61%
(
51 of
84)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
8
68%
(
44 of
65)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
29 of
51)
40%
(
8 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
11 of
33)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
39%
(
33 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
44 of
84)
96
Total Points Won
73
|
6-0 5-7 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Jahnie Van Zyl
Player
Ashmitha Easwaramurthi
76%
(
39 of
51)
1st Serve %
73%
(
27 of
37)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
5
72%
(
28 of
39)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
31%
(
16 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
20 of
37)
55
Total Points Won
33
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Matilde Mariani
Player
Jahnie Van Zyl
63%
(
32 of
51)
1st Serve %
58%
(
35 of
60)
-
Aces
-
5
Double Faults
5
66%
(
21 of
32)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
16 of
35)
42%
(
8 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
7 of
25)
88%
(
7 of
8)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
43%
(
22 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
37 of
60)
66
Total Points Won
45
|
6-0 7-5 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Jahnie Van Zyl
Player
Maddalena Giordano
76%
(
34 of
45)
1st Serve %
61%
(
36 of
59)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
2
59%
(
20 of
34)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
15 of
36)
55%
(
6 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
4 of
4)
42%
(
19 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
36 of
59)
62
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Jahnie Van Zyl
Player
Isabella Kruger
54%
(
49 of
90)
1st Serve %
49%
(
39 of
79)
0
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
9
63%
(
31 of
49)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
20 of
39)
44%
(
18 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
16 of
40)
47%
(
7 of
15)
Break Points Won
71%
(
5 of
7)
46%
(
41 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
43 of
79)
92
Total Points Won
77
|
3-6 6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Jahnie Van Zyl
Player
Ekua Youri
63%
(
24 of
38)
1st Serve %
62%
(
39 of
63)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
79%
(
19 of
24)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
20 of
39)
79%
(
11 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
21%
(
8 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
36 of
63)
66
Total Points Won
35
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-3 6-3 | H2H |
view more
Noa Liauw A Fong Recent Matches Played
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Lara Pfeifer
Player
Noa Liauw A Fong
62%
(
39 of
63)
1st Serve %
66%
(
39 of
59)
-
Aces
-
5
Double Faults
4
59%
(
23 of
39)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
15 of
39)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
43%
(
27 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
35 of
59)
71
Total Points Won
51
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Noa Liauw A Fong
Player
Koronayashe Rugara
58%
(
53 of
92)
1st Serve %
56%
(
39 of
70)
-
Aces
-
8
Double Faults
13
55%
(
29 of
53)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
18 of
39)
33%
(
13 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
7 of
31)
44%
(
8 of
18)
Break Points Won
53%
(
8 of
15)
54%
(
50 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
45 of
70)
87
Total Points Won
75
|
6-4 4-6 10-1 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Noa Liauw A Fong
Player
Theodora Degelow
74%
(
39 of
53)
1st Serve %
44%
(
15 of
34)
2
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
5
67%
(
26 of
39)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
43%
(
6 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
40%
(
21 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
52
Total Points Won
35
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Elena Jamshidi
Player
Noa Liauw A Fong
78%
(
29 of
37)
1st Serve %
71%
(
39 of
55)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
3
72%
(
21 of
29)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
19 of
39)
75%
(
6 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
19%
(
3 of
16)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
27%
(
10 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
33 of
55)
60
Total Points Won
32
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Noa Liauw A Fong
Player
Smriti Bhasin
65%
(
40 of
62)
1st Serve %
57%
(
29 of
51)
-
Aces
-
5
Double Faults
8
50%
(
20 of
40)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
5 of
22)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
47%
(
29 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
34 of
51)
67
Total Points Won
46
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Noa Liauw A Fong
Player
Linge Steenkamp
77%
(
58 of
75)
1st Serve %
75%
(
50 of
67)
0
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
1
67%
(
39 of
58)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
29 of
50)
41%
(
7 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
39%
(
29 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
31 of
67)
77
Total Points Won
65
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Noa Liauw A Fong
Player
Talita Swart
78%
(
42 of
54)
1st Serve %
61%
(
25 of
41)
-
Aces
-
5
Double Faults
5
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
33%
(
4 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
19%
(
3 of
16)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
39%
(
21 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
26 of
41)
59
Total Points Won
36
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Jacqueline Cabaj Awad
Player
Noa Liauw A Fong
75%
(
33 of
44)
1st Serve %
37%
(
18 of
49)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
8
70%
(
23 of
33)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
45%
(
5 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
10 of
31)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
36%
(
16 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
30 of
49)
58
Total Points Won
35
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Noa Liauw A Fong
Player
Ashmitha Easwaramurthi
47%
(
24 of
51)
1st Serve %
59%
(
35 of
59)
-
Aces
-
8
Double Faults
3
71%
(
17 of
24)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
16 of
35)
41%
(
11 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
45%
(
23 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
35 of
59)
63
Total Points Won
47
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Carolann Delaunay
Player
Noa Liauw A Fong
69%
(
46 of
67)
1st Serve %
80%
(
57 of
71)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
54%
(
25 of
46)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
29 of
57)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
46%
(
31 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
38 of
71)
74
Total Points Won
64
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H |
view more
Zyl Vs Fong Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Zyl are available here and Fong photos here.
![Zyl Fong H2h Summary Stats 3rd July 2024 Zyl Fong H2h Summary Stats 3rd July 2024](https://matchstat.com/captures/ms/wta/Jahnie-Van-Zyl-Noa-Liauw-A-Fong-h2h-profile.webp)
![Jahnie Van Zyl Noa Liauw A Fong Prediction Stats Jahnie Van Zyl Noa Liauw A Fong Prediction Stats](https://matchstat.com/captures/ms/wta/Jahnie-Van-Zyl-Noa-Liauw-A-Fong-h2h-stats.webp)